RSS

Famine Granaries – where did it go wrong?

Courtsey of worldofstock.com

Food security – lessons from the past

Many so called nationalists will point figures to colonialism almost as a singleton source to Uganda’s past, current and even future problems. But let us face it, there some good, if not excellent ideas that colonialists left when we gained independence. In fact so good, that the real nationalists who took over power post independence retained during their governance. One such idea was famine food granaries.

A typical village life was subsistence farming-based basically revolving around growing food for consumption, keeping some livestock and birds, and growing at least one cash crop. Among the three major traditional cash crops, cotton was grown across the country, coffee was concentrated in the Eastern and Central regions, and tobacco was mostly in the Western region.

An ordinary person’s primary objective of a cash crop, particularly cotton was to pay poll tax. Apart from the household basics, any surplus was usually spent on three items: Giving the family a Christmas treat – new clothing and meat; to enhancing personal status – buying a bicycle, buying corrugated iron sheets; occasionally toping up school fees in those cases where the child(children) was (were) at secondary school. The luckiest were the coffee farmers whose cropped once planted became an annual cash generator even with minimal effort.

A household was by law required to set aside a famine food reserve. During harvest time a portion of the less-perishable principle hard food crop, usually dried maize, millet, sorghum or dried potato, cassava or banana chips was stored in a granary. The granary size was based on the number of people in the household. This granary was sealed in the presence of a mutongole chief (the equivalent of RC2?).

Under no circumstance would the granary be accesses in the absence of the chief, whose sole permission was a requirement. Every effort was made to ensure that even vermin had no access to the reserves. The top of the granary was sealed with mud, which in turn had a top lining of a pesticide in the form of cow dung. There was even a 24 hour security guard provided by the scariest thorns, renowned by their poisonous stings, which were stationed at the little entrance between the granary and its roof.

In the event of failure in the season, the reserves were released to the head of the household, but under a controlled manner by the chief. This ensured that, although rationed, there was food to fall back, through internal reserves, putting minimal if any burden to government.

If there was no famine during the cropping year, households were given a free hand to the reserves around Easter (April) time. This coincided with often a rainy period when the new crop was growing, but food supplies had dwindled because of the Christmas time hot and dry spell. Therefore, short of a natural disaster, a replacement reserve was almost a certainty within months.

Some heads of households took advantage of this arrangement, and also earmarked granaries for themselves. Effectively, there were three types of granaries – one which the wife (or wives) had free access to, another which belonged to the man of the household, and the famine reserve.

The man’s granary was used to serve any ‘manly’ emergencies that arose during the year, serving as a source of cash in some instances. In addition, come Christmas season when it was too hot to do anything apart from clearing field, it was used for the season’s local brew feasts. Families took advantage of X-mas and rewarded themselves for year’s hard work by feasting from weeks before Christmas well into the new year of in villages clubs involving a rotating local brew entertainment.

This colonial idea was abandoned in the mid-1960s. However, the cautious, or should I say wise families continued with a similar approach. But there were people, including one of my uncles, who took advantage of the freedom and foolishly sold their produce every year, some of it in the garden, the rest hardly a month after harvesting. They exposed their families to annual famine. My uncle’s wife laboured for other people in exchange for food year after year. Probably mostly due to this, she died a young women. The fellow has failed to get another wife due to his famine brand.

The economic sanction imposed on Amin’s regime meant that what was taken for granted as essential products, were not available in the shops. The high demand for almost non-existent products drove up the magendo (black market) prices of the products smuggled from bordering countries. The only way to afford this era, people faced financial hardship and started converting some of the food crops into cash – which were in turn smuggled into neighbouring countries. This trend continued through the Milton Obote II and Okello regimes.

However, the real turning point came through an official government policy. The NRM regime followed the globalisation trend by pursuing a programme of diversification into non-traditional cash crops – a program encouraging cashing in traditional food crops.

It coincided with an escalation of school fees, especially at secondary schools. It was an opening for a subsistence farmer who had no other source of income to cash in and support the family. But there has been no control. In some cases, nothing was left for domestic consumption. This exposed families to famine when the seasons changed or rains failed to come in time. Even people with regular income entered the same racket – supported by a world food programme, which started buying locally.

These days, some people sell their food in the garden – they do not even have to harvest it. The irony is that they use the money from the food to buy food! But can you blame them? People are pressurised by high costs of living – you need a small brother whenever you go – health care, education etc. To an extent, there is no food security anymore.

This is made worse by certain factors. While the arable acreage has remained static, except in instances where forests and wetlands have been encroached upon, the population has grown. This has led to high population density particularly in high density districts and high land fragmentation as plots of increasingly get divided across family tree. The quantity produced per mouth has reduced.

Surely, weren’t those the good old days, and these are the bad new days? Would such a system succeed under RC? It takes a political will.

 

4 responses to “Famine Granaries – where did it go wrong?

  1. Weight Loss Meditation

    April 4, 2014 at 2:02 am

    I blog often and I really thank you for your information.
    This great article has truly peaked my interest. I will book
    mark your blog and keep checking for new details about once a week.
    I opted in for your Feed too.

     
    • bedsidereadings

      April 4, 2014 at 5:52 am

      Thanks WLM and please supply links to your networks.

       
  2. Sam

    November 7, 2011 at 3:27 am

    With due respect, I disagree. I think we give too much credit to where it does not belong.
    The earliest granaries: Food for thought
    Dr Kuijt and Dr Finlayson have been excavating a site called Dhra, in Jordan, near the Dead Sea. They have uncovered evidence that sophisticated ways of storing grain had been developed well before cereals were actually domesticated. The discoveries the two researche

    “These granaries reflect new forms of risk reduction, intensification and low-level food production,” Kuijt said.
    “These granaries are a critical fist step, if not the very evolutionary and technological foundation, for the development of large agricultural villages that appear by 9,500 to 9,000 years ago across the Near East,” Kuijt said.

    From what I was told by my old relatives when I was a kid, was that the granaries were always part of our culture, well before they first saw a white man. Saving for a rainy day ( or dry day for that matter) was not a foreign import strategy from colonialists into other cultures, possibly colonialists may have redirected on how to improve it so that they could have more man labour hours to invest in production of cash crops and mining for export to their Queen or King to support the industrial revolution.

    Any extended and massive interruption of any society’s civilization from without, alters a natural trend, a direction that has sustained and worked for the people over the ages.

    I do think that saving food such as grains that are not easily perishable and storing them safely for a rainy day is as basic as cultivation itself. I would not label it as a colonialist’s invention.

    Case in point:-
    – Genesis 41:40-50 (New International Version) http://www.biblestudytools.com/genesis/passage.aspx?q=genesis+41:40-50

    47 During the seven years of abundance the land produced plentifully. 48 Joseph collected all the food produced in those seven years of abundance in Egypt and stored it in the cities. In each city he put the food grown in the fields surrounding it. 49 Joseph stored up huge quantities of grain, like the sand of the sea; it was so much that he stopped keeping records because it was beyond measure.

    – Agriculture and horticulture in ancient Egypt
    Granaries at Akhetaten:- http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/timelines/topics/agriculture.htm

    http://www.timbuktufoundation.org/university.html
    Around the 12th century, the University of Timbuktu had an attendance of 25, 000 students in a city which had a population of 100, 000 people. The students came from all corners of the African continent in search of excellence in knowledge and trade.
    Surely these people had to have not only known something about granaries, but used them in some form to sustain such civilization when the harvest was poor.

    In every civilization any where in history, we find well developed ways of food storage specifically for famine periods. Whether in Indus Valley Civilization, Ecient Egypt, Timbuktu, Buganda or Great Zimbabwe.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Zimbabwe

    Great Zimbabwe is a ruined city that was once the capital of the Kingdom of Zimbabwe, which existed from 1100 to 1450 AD during the country’s Late Iron Age.
    The ruins were first encountered by Europeans in the late 19th century with investigation of the site starting in 1871.[1] The monument caused great controversy amongst the archaeological world, with political pressure being placed upon archaeologists by the then white supremacist government of Rhodesia to deny that it could have ever been produced by native Zimbabweans.

    I wouldn’t call famine food granaries a colonial idea.

     
    • bedsidereadings

      November 7, 2011 at 9:04 am

      Yes they existed – but this article talks more about using the ‘law’ to enforce their efficient and strategic use – i.e. forced ‘voluntary’, storage.

       

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: