What is Terminator technology?
Terminator technology is the genetic modification of plants to make them produce sterile seeds. They are also known as suicide seeds. Terminator’s official name – used by the UN and scientists is- Genetic Use Restriction Technologies (GURTs).
NARO BRINGS TERMINATOR TECH INTO UGANDA
Dr Imelda Kashaija, deputy director general in charge of agricultural technology promotion at NARO revealed that, NARO has genetically engineered crops which cannot be replanted and, every crop season, farmers must buy new seeds.
In other words, NARO has been involved in Terminator Technology all along, contrary to the assurance that NARO would never introduce Monsanto’s Terminator Technology into Uganda.
Sept, 2002: “There is no terminator seed that the American company, MONSANTO has brought into the country. What they brought in was hybrid maize and they followed the correct procedures. However, we shall use biotechnology to increase crop and animal yields as well as reduce pests and disease incidence,” Kisamba said.
Just like the rest of the world, even the US, Ugandans have always been against the Terminator technology.
As far back as 1999, there were fears that what is happening now, would come to pass. “Let the new science take hold, opponents warn darkly, and farmers could find themselves coming to Monsanto, seed cup in hand, paying whatever the company demands before they can plant that season’s crop.”
But the irony behind all this, is that Monsanto won’t even come clean , let alone own to being behind handing over its Terminator Technology to NARO, after all, it is Monsanto which bought and now owns this Terminator technology, US patent 5,723,765 – or the Technology Protection System (TPS), how could NARO use it without Monsanto’s permission and/or participation?
Note: The USDA and Delta and Pine Land have filed Terminator patent applications in dozens of countries. In many of those countries farmers can’t afford to buy top-of-the-line seeds every year and must rely on saving a portion of each crop in order to plant their fields the following year.
Monsanto insists that weak patent protection in many of these countries makes a technology like Terminator especially important. But that argument carries little weight in parts of the world where food bowls are going empty. “This technology brings no benefit to farmers,” says Hope Shand, research director of RAFI.
Investigation into this matter of how Terminator Technology introduction into the country by NARO took place without the government’s knowledge and/or authorization needs to be taken as soon as possible . Is it any wonder that we now have many poor farmers complaining of being provided seeds that won’t germinate!
A culture of blame-shifting is deeply entrenched in the seed sector. Complain to the village seed dealer and he’ll blame his distributor.
Ask the distributor and he’ll blame the company. Ask the company and it’ll blame the National Agricultural Research Organization that supplied the foundation seed. Ask the people there, and they’ll blame the regulators and the seed lab at Kawanda. The buck stops nowhere.
I think the buck stops with the likes of Dr Imelda Kashaija and NARO scientists for introduction of Monsanto’s patented Terminator Technology into Uganda of engineering crops which cannot be replanted and, every crop season, farmers must buy new seeds.
Terminator Technology Moratorium
There is an international moratorium on the use of Terminator technology. Terminator seeds are genetically engineered to be sterile after first harvest. Brazil and India also have national bans on Terminator technology.
Note: Why you can’t trust Monsanto (and its shills like NARO):
In an open letter from Monsanto CEO Robert B. Shapiro to Rockefeller Foundation President Gordon Conway, Monsanto announced it will not pursue technologies that render seed sterile.
October 4, 1999
Dr. Gordon Conway President
Rockefeller Foundation 420 5th Avenue
New York, NY 10018-2702 Dear Gordon:
I am writing to let you know that we are making a public commitment not to commercialize sterile seed technologies, such as the one dubbed “Terminator.” We are doing this based on input from you and a wide range of other experts and stakeholders, including our very important grower constituency.
As you know, sterile seed technology is one of a class of so-called “gene protection systems.” This is a group of technologies, all still in the conceptual or developmental stage, that could potentially be used to protect the investment companies make in developing genetically-improved crops, as well as possibly providing other agronomic benefits. Some would work by rendering seeds from such crops sterile, while others would work by other means, such as deactivating only the value-added biotech trait. One of the sterile seed technologies was developed and patented jointly by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Delta & Pine Land, with which we announced our intent to merge in the spring of 1998.
Last April, after hearing concerns about the potential impact of gene protection systems in developing countries and consulting with a number of international experts and development leaders, we called for a thorough, independent review of gene protection systems. We also pledged not to commercialize any of them until that review was completed and we had responded to the issues raised.
Since then, however, we have continued to listen to people who have a particular interest in sterile seed technologies, including the concerns you expressed to our Board in June. Though we do not yet own any sterile seed technology, we think it is important to respond to those concerns at this time by making clear our commitment not to commercialize gene protection systems that render seed sterile.
It is also important to understand that the technical and business utility of sterile seed technology is speculative. The specific technology over which Monsanto would gain ownership through its pending merger with Delta & Pine Land is developmental, at least five years away from any possible commercialization, and may or may not prove workable in a commercial setting.
The need for companies to protect and gain a return on their investments in agricultural innovation is real. Without this return, we would no longer be able to continue developing new products growers have said they want. Monsanto holds patents on technological approaches to gene protection that do not render seeds sterile and has studied one that would inactivate only the specific gene(s) responsible for the value-added biotech trait. We are not currently investing resources to develop these technologies, but we do not rule out their future development and use for gene protection or their possible agronomic benefits.
For this reason, we continue to support the open, independent airing of all of the issues raised by the use of gene protection systems to protect the investment companies make in agricultural innovation. We understand, for example, that the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences is planning an international study of these issues. We renew the pledge we made in April that we will not make any decision to commercialize a gene protection technology until a full airing of the issues is complete and we have responded publicly to the concerns that are raised.
We are fully committed to modern biotechnology as a safe, sustainable tool for farmers and an important contributor to the future success of agriculture in meeting the world’s needs for food and fiber. The technology has already brought important benefits to growers and the environment after just a few years of commercial application. We are working hard to build on this success.
We also recognize that biotechnology, like any new technology, raises issues that must be addressed. We appreciate your involvement with these important issues and the perspective and expertise you contributed at our June Board meeting. We find significant value in engaging stakeholders and the expert community in active dialogue on issues surrounding biotechnology and the future success of agriculture. I look forward to continuing our dialogue with you on the many issues and challenges that lie ahead.
Robert B. Shapiro Chairman and CEO Monsanto Company
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for research and educational purposes only.